Tax Court Rejects Bloomberg’s Gross Receipts and Expense Allocations as ‘Unreasonable’

Corporate building facade

Tax Court Rejects Bloomberg’s Gross Receipts and Expense Allocations as ‘Unreasonable’

Understanding Section 199 Deductions and the Importance of Accurate Allocations

The Tax Court recently ruled against Bloomberg in two consolidated cases concerning how the company allocated gross receipts and expenses for subscription-based software products. The court also overturned certain IRS-denied deductions, offering a mixed outcome. This decision provides valuable insights for businesses navigating complex tax deduction regulations, especially under Section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Section 199 Deductions Explained

Section 199, often referred to as the Domestic Production Activities Deduction (DPAD), allowed businesses to claim deductions for domestic production activities. For tax years 2008-2010, this deduction equaled 6% to 9% of the lesser of:

  1. The taxpayer’s qualified production activities income (QPAI).
  2. The taxpayer’s taxable income without regard to Section 199.

The deduction was further limited to 50% of wages allocable to domestic production gross receipts (DPGR). Though repealed in 2017 under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Section 199 remains relevant for earlier tax disputes.

Bloomberg’s Case

Bloomberg sought deductions under Section 199 for two subscription-based software products. These products, which bundled financial data, analytics, and communication tools, were hosted on Bloomberg’s servers. Customers accessed the software via paid subscriptions, either by installing it on their devices or through online platforms.

The company argued that a significant portion of the subscription fees and expenses qualified as DPGR. Bloomberg cited a Treasury Regulation exception, claiming its software was similar to third-party software distributed via disk or download. However, the IRS rejected this claim, stating the receipts were derived from services, not software.

Tax Court Findings

The court noted that Bloomberg used inconsistent methods to allocate gross receipts and expenses across federal and state filings. These discrepancies, combined with changes in allocation methods during litigation, led the court to conclude that Bloomberg’s approach was “not reasonable.”

Despite this, the court acknowledged ambiguities in the Treasury regulations, especially given the complexities of modern software services. Bloomberg’s DPGR for Section 199 purposes was ultimately calculated as follows:

  1. 2008: $1.3 billion
  2. 2009: $1.4 billion
  3. 2010: $1.5 billion

Allocable expenses totaled $769 million, $799 million, and $887 million for those years, respectively.

Lessons for Businesses

Bloomberg’s case underscores the challenges of interpreting and applying tax regulations for innovative business models. Here are some key takeaways:

  1. Consistency is Crucial: Ensure allocation methods are consistent across federal and state returns. Discrepancies can undermine credibility.
  2. Document Thoroughly: Keep detailed records to justify allocations and deductions. This includes agreements, receipts, and calculation methods.
  3. Understand Treasury Regulations: Familiarize yourself with relevant regulations, especially for unique business activities.
  4. Seek Expert Advice: Engage tax professionals to navigate complex deductions like Section 199. Expert guidance can prevent costly disputes.
  5. Adapt to Change: Stay informed about evolving tax laws and how they impact deductions for modern services like software.

Conclusion

The Tax Court’s ruling in Bloomberg’s case highlights the importance of accuracy, consistency, and documentation in tax reporting. While the court acknowledged regulatory ambiguities, Bloomberg’s inconsistent allocation methods proved a significant hurdle. Businesses must approach complex deductions with care, leveraging expert advice to avoid similar pitfalls.


You can find the right professional who has been verified by us on our platform. You can also post your project on our marketplace and rest assured that your issues will be handled with complete integrity. As a professional – Please sign up to access resources and tools to help you serve your clients better. Our resource directory also offers valuable links to assist in managing various financial and legal aspects of a business or individual.

Picture of iFind Taxpro

iFind Taxpro

Ask a question

Data security and privacy are our topmost priorities. Your personal details will not be shared publicly.

Required fields are marked *

related