Taxpayer Avoids IRS Penalty in Foreign Business Reporting Case

The Tax Court recently ruled that the IRS does not have the authority to impose penalties on taxpayers who fail to report ownership of foreign corporations under Code Sec. 6038(b). This decision came after Raju Mukhi, who owned several foreign entities, did not file required tax forms for many years.

Mukhi had created multiple foreign entities, including trusts and corporations. However, he failed to file important forms, such as:

1. Form 3520: Reports on foreign trusts and large foreign gifts.
2. Form 3520-A: Reports on annual foreign trust details for U.S. owners.
3. Form 5471: Reports on U.S. persons with foreign corporate ownership.

The IRS imposed over $11 million in penalties on him for failing to file these forms, including:

1. $120,000 for failing to file Form 5471.
2. Over $10.9 million for failing to file Forms 3520 and 3520-A.

Why the Taxpayer Challenged the Penalties

Mukhi argued that the penalties violated their rights under the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution, which protects against excessive fines. They also claimed that the process was unfair because a settlement officer allegedly worked with an appeals officer during their hearing.

The Tax Court reviewed these claims and issued its first decision in April 2024. Here’s what the court decided:

1. The IRS did not have authority to assess penalties under Code Sec. 6038(b) for failing to report foreign corporation ownership.
2. The penalties for not filing foreign trust forms under Code Sec. 6677 were valid because they did not qualify as “fines.”
3. The taxpayer’s claims of unfair process did not hold up.

The IRS Appeals the Ruling

A month later, the D.C. Circuit Court issued a decision in a similar case. It ruled that the IRS does, in fact, have the authority to assess penalties under Code Sec. 6038(b). The IRS used this ruling to ask the Tax Court to reconsider its earlier decision.

Despite the D.C. Circuit’s ruling, the Tax Court stuck to its decision. It explained that:

1. The IRS’s authority comes directly from Congress.
2. In this case, Congress did not grant the IRS the power to impose these penalties.

The court also clarified that just because the Department of Justice could collect these penalties, it does not mean the IRS has the same authority. The Tax Court rejected the idea that legislative history supported the IRS’s argument.

What This Means for Taxpayers

This case highlights the complex rules around owning foreign businesses and reporting foreign assets. U.S. taxpayers must file specific forms if they control foreign corporations, receive foreign gifts, or have foreign trusts.

The Tax Court’s decision means that penalties for not filing Form 5471 must be collected by the Department of Justice (DOJ). The IRS cannot impose them directly. However, penalties for not filing other foreign reporting forms, such as Form 3520, are still valid.

The ruling also reminds taxpayers that ignoring these requirements can lead to significant penalties, even if the IRS’s authority to impose them is limited.

Final Thoughts

If you have foreign assets or businesses, it’s crucial to understand your reporting obligations. Noncompliance penalties can be severe, and some may be enforced through court proceedings. Consulting a tax professional can help you avoid these pitfalls and stay on the right side of the law.

Our resource directory offers valuable links to assist in managing various financial and legal aspects of a business or individual. Consider utilizing marketplaces like IfindTaxPro, you can post your project and find the right professional for your needs. If You are a professional, looking to find clients, then sign up.